Corporate Governance Report
Chairman
– Dr.ª Alice de Assunção Castanho Amado: € 1.334,44;
Vice-Chairman
– Dr.ª Anabela Nogueira de Matos: € 667,92;
Secretary
– Dr.ª Maria Leonor Moreira Pires Cabral Campello: € 333,36;
b) The shareholder ATPS-SGPS, SA. provided administrative and management servi-
ces to the Group and in 2015 received from the investee Ibersol, Restauração, SA.
a total of 800.000,00 euros for such services. One of the obligations of ATPS-
-Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, SA. under the service agreement
with Ibersol, Restauração, SA. is to ensure that the directors of the Company
António Carlos Vaz Pinto de Sousa and António Alberto Guerra Leal Teixeira per-
form their duties without the Company having to incur additional expense. The
Company does not directly pay any remuneration to any of its executive direc-
tors. Given that ATPS-Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, SA. is control-
led in equal parts by the directors António Carlos Vaz Pinto de Sousa and António
Alberto Guerra Leal Teixeira, out of the abovementioned total of 800.000,00
euros paid in 2015, each director received the amount of 400.000,00 euros.
The non-executive member receives annual remuneration of 6.000,00 euros.
In view of the above, it is not possible to issue a statement on the remuneration
policy of the members of the governing body of the company, particularly not a
report containing the information mentioned in article 2.3 of Law 28/2009.
c) The remuneration of the members of the Audit Committee for 2015 was set at a
fixed annual amount, payable twelve times a year. The individual members recei-
ved the following annual remuneration:
Chairman – Dr. Joaquim Alexandre de Oliveira e Silva: € 8.785,92;
Vice-Chairman – Dr. António Maria de Borda Cardoso: € 8.785,92;
Director – Dr. Eduardo Moutinho dos Santos: € 8.785,92;
The general principles
observed are essentially those that follow from the law,
taking into account the activities actually performed by the above persons, the
Company’s economic situation and the usual terms and conditions in comparable si-
tuations. The functions performed by each member of the corporate governing bo-
dies were considered in the most broadest sense of the activity actually performed,
using the level of responsibility as an assessment parameter. The weighting of the
functions is considered in a broad sense, in the light of various factors, particularly
the level of responsibility, the time spent and the value the member’s institutional
role added to the Group. The size of the company and the degree of complexity of
the assigned functions is also an important aspect. The combination of the above-
188
